<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182649</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible where a loan licencee received inputs directly in its factory for use in manufacturing pharmaceutical products for principal manufacturers, even though the invoices were made out to those principal manufacturers. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that credit is available when goods are purchased for and supplied directly to the manufacturer, and it rejected the objection based solely on the invoice names. The principal manufacturers&#039; exemption from registration under Rule 174, by Notification No. 27/92-CE dated 9 December 1992, did not defeat the assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 16:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 577 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182649</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible where a loan licencee received inputs directly in its factory for use in manufacturing pharmaceutical products for principal manufacturers, even though the invoices were made out to those principal manufacturers. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that credit is available when goods are purchased for and supplied directly to the manufacturer, and it rejected the objection based solely on the invoice names. The principal manufacturers&#039; exemption from registration under Rule 174, by Notification No. 27/92-CE dated 9 December 1992, did not defeat the assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>