https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182645 Pre-execution review of a preventive detention order is confined to narrow, recognised exceptions, and no general right exists to quash such an order at that stage. The Court found no material showing lack of competence in the detention order, and rejected objections based on alleged vagueness, delay in passing or executing the order, and later events said to break the nexus. Where the detenue was absconding and execution attempts had been made, delay alone did not justify interference. The detention order was therefore not interfered with, and the writ petition was rejected. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2016 16:21:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182645 Pre-execution review of a preventive detention order is confined to narrow, recognised exceptions, and no general right exists to quash such an order at that stage. The Court found no material showing lack of competence in the detention order, and rejected objections based on alleged vagueness, delay in passing or executing the order, and later events said to break the nexus. Where the detenue was absconding and execution attempts had been made, delay alone did not justify interference. The detention order was therefore not interfered with, and the writ petition was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182645