<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 538 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income as income from house property, determined the Annual Letting Value (ALV) based on the municipal rateable value without including notional interest, and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider the grounds related to the charge of interest and penalty enhancement. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, and those of the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 16:06:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 538 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income as income from house property, determined the Annual Letting Value (ALV) based on the municipal rateable value without including notional interest, and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to consider the grounds related to the charge of interest and penalty enhancement. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, and those of the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>