<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3484</link>
    <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption under Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures Rules, assessing them under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Show cause notices were invalidated as time-barred. Appeals related to hair dye were dismissed, while those concerning lip smoother and shampoo were allowed, noting they are not usually sold in large multi-piece packages for retail sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3484</link>
      <description>The court upheld the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption under Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures Rules, assessing them under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Show cause notices were invalidated as time-barred. Appeals related to hair dye were dismissed, while those concerning lip smoother and shampoo were allowed, noting they are not usually sold in large multi-piece packages for retail sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>