<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182636</link>
    <description>The Division Bench of the Patna High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the police report submitted under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, along with its accompaniments, satisfied the requirements of Section 11 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court concluded that the report by a public servant sufficed for compliance with Section 11 and that the magistrate could consider the report and its accompaniments for taking cognizance of the offence under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 15:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 197 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182636</link>
      <description>The Division Bench of the Patna High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the police report submitted under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, along with its accompaniments, satisfied the requirements of Section 11 of the Essential Commodities Act. The court concluded that the report by a public servant sufficed for compliance with Section 11 and that the magistrate could consider the report and its accompaniments for taking cognizance of the offence under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>