https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182631 The Supreme Court ruled that a party can produce additional evidence in the appellate court under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC without having led any evidence in the trial court. The Court clarified that the conditions specified in the rule must be proved to exist, and there is no requirement for a party to have presented evidence in the trial court to introduce additional evidence in the appellate court. The High Court's decision was overturned, and the matter was remanded for further consideration on merits. The Supreme Court emphasized the incorrect interpretation of the rule by other High Courts and directed a review of the appellant's application on its merits. en-us Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2016 14:31:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182631 The Supreme Court ruled that a party can produce additional evidence in the appellate court under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC without having led any evidence in the trial court. The Court clarified that the conditions specified in the rule must be proved to exist, and there is no requirement for a party to have presented evidence in the trial court to introduce additional evidence in the appellate court. The High Court's decision was overturned, and the matter was remanded for further consideration on merits. The Supreme Court emphasized the incorrect interpretation of the rule by other High Courts and directed a review of the appellant's application on its merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182631