https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182627 The Supreme Court dismissed the detenu's petition challenging the detention order's validity. The court held that the detaining authority's consideration of the detenu's representation was in line with established rules, regardless of whether it was the Home Secretary or the Home Minister who rejected it. Additionally, the court found that the detenu's retracted confession was received after the detention order was issued, making it impossible for the authority to consider it. Despite the detenu's claim of mental health impact, a psychiatric examination revealed no unsoundness of mind, leading the court to reject all contentions and dismiss the petition and special leave petition. en-us Fri, 17 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2016 12:16:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182627 The Supreme Court dismissed the detenu's petition challenging the detention order's validity. The court held that the detaining authority's consideration of the detenu's representation was in line with established rules, regardless of whether it was the Home Secretary or the Home Minister who rejected it. Additionally, the court found that the detenu's retracted confession was received after the detention order was issued, making it impossible for the authority to consider it. Despite the detenu's claim of mental health impact, a psychiatric examination revealed no unsoundness of mind, leading the court to reject all contentions and dismiss the petition and special leave petition. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182627