https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182626 Preventive detention is vitiated where unexplained delay at the sponsoring stage and in issuing the detention order breaks the live link between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention, as strict compliance with constitutional safeguards is required. The Court further held that non-supply of relied upon co-accused statements impaired the detenu's right to effective representation under Article 22(5), and that failure to consider material retractions undermined the subjective satisfaction supporting detention. On these grounds, the detention order could not be sustained and the detenu was entitled to release unless required in another case. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2016 12:10:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182626 Preventive detention is vitiated where unexplained delay at the sponsoring stage and in issuing the detention order breaks the live link between the alleged prejudicial activity and the detention, as strict compliance with constitutional safeguards is required. The Court further held that non-supply of relied upon co-accused statements impaired the detenu's right to effective representation under Article 22(5), and that failure to consider material retractions undermined the subjective satisfaction supporting detention. On these grounds, the detention order could not be sustained and the detenu was entitled to release unless required in another case. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182626