<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1301 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182625</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the non-placement of vital documents before the detaining authority invalidated the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act. The court ruled that the failure to provide the complaint and FIR to the detenu violated his right to make an effective representation, leading to the quashing of the detention order and ordering the immediate release of the detenu, unless wanted in another case. The petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 12:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1301 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182625</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, holding that the non-placement of vital documents before the detaining authority invalidated the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act. The court ruled that the failure to provide the complaint and FIR to the detenu violated his right to make an effective representation, leading to the quashing of the detention order and ordering the immediate release of the detenu, unless wanted in another case. The petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>