<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 691 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182624</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the Division Bench&#039;s decision to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. It held that the Division Bench erred in concluding the suit was barred by limitation without considering the independent claims requiring evidence. The case was remanded to the Trial Court for determination, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 691 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182624</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the Division Bench&#039;s decision to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. It held that the Division Bench erred in concluding the suit was barred by limitation without considering the independent claims requiring evidence. The case was remanded to the Trial Court for determination, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>