<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 691 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182624</link>
    <description>A plaint may be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) only when, on a meaningful reading of the entire pleading, the bar of law is apparent from the plaint itself. Disputed questions of fact and limitation that depend on evidence cannot be decided at that stage, and a claim with multiple reliefs on distinct factual foundations cannot be treated as barred by isolating one alleged source of relief. On the plaint as pleaded, the suit did not clearly appear to be barred by law, so rejection of the plaint was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 691 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182624</link>
      <description>A plaint may be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) only when, on a meaningful reading of the entire pleading, the bar of law is apparent from the plaint itself. Disputed questions of fact and limitation that depend on evidence cannot be decided at that stage, and a claim with multiple reliefs on distinct factual foundations cannot be treated as barred by isolating one alleged source of relief. On the plaint as pleaded, the suit did not clearly appear to be barred by law, so rejection of the plaint was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>