https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182620 The court held that the Detaining Authority's failure to consider a crucial second retraction document dated 2nd December 2002, which was not presented before it, significantly impacted the validity of the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act. Emphasizing the necessity of presenting all vital materials for a fair decision-making process, the court found that the omission of the document invalidated the detention order. As a result, the rule was made absolute, directing the immediate release of the detenu unless required otherwise under lawful authority. en-us Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2016 11:37:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182620 The court held that the Detaining Authority's failure to consider a crucial second retraction document dated 2nd December 2002, which was not presented before it, significantly impacted the validity of the detention order under the COFEPOSA Act. Emphasizing the necessity of presenting all vital materials for a fair decision-making process, the court found that the omission of the document invalidated the detention order. As a result, the rule was made absolute, directing the immediate release of the detenu unless required otherwise under lawful authority. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182620