<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 617 - High Court Of Bombay</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182618</link>
    <description>Where a detenu is already on bail, the bail application and bail order are vital materials for the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. Failure to place the bail application before the authority amounts to consideration without a relevant document and vitiates the detention order for non-application of mind. The same omission also impairs the detenu&#039;s constitutional right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation. The contention that the bail application was unnecessary because the bail order reflected the same material was rejected, and the detention order was held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 11:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 617 - High Court Of Bombay</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182618</link>
      <description>Where a detenu is already on bail, the bail application and bail order are vital materials for the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. Failure to place the bail application before the authority amounts to consideration without a relevant document and vitiates the detention order for non-application of mind. The same omission also impairs the detenu&#039;s constitutional right under Article 22(5) to make an effective representation. The contention that the bail application was unnecessary because the bail order reflected the same material was rejected, and the detention order was held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>