https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182616 The case involved issues regarding the violation of fundamental rights, legality of trial by an unauthorized judge, right of appeal, speedier trial violating Article 14, challenge to judicial orders, impact of crime's severity and accused's status on constitutional rights, binding nature of decisions given per incuriam, objections to trial before a non-appointed judge, appointment of High Court judges as Special Judges, liberal interpretation of Article 21, judicial discipline in referring cases to larger benches, and the effect of unconstitutional proceedings on subsequent decisions. The court decided to refer the case to a larger bench of seven judges for a comprehensive review while rejecting the prayer to vacate the stay. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2016 10:48:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182616 The case involved issues regarding the violation of fundamental rights, legality of trial by an unauthorized judge, right of appeal, speedier trial violating Article 14, challenge to judicial orders, impact of crime's severity and accused's status on constitutional rights, binding nature of decisions given per incuriam, objections to trial before a non-appointed judge, appointment of High Court judges as Special Judges, liberal interpretation of Article 21, judicial discipline in referring cases to larger benches, and the effect of unconstitutional proceedings on subsequent decisions. The court decided to refer the case to a larger bench of seven judges for a comprehensive review while rejecting the prayer to vacate the stay. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182616