https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182611 Preventive detention law does not require prior supply of the detention order, grounds, or supporting materials before execution, and Article 22 does not create such a pre-arrest entitlement. The Right to Information Act cannot override that scheme, so a proposed detenu has no enforceable right to obtain those documents in advance. Pre-execution challenge to a detention order is available only in exceptional cases, such as lack of jurisdiction, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague and extraneous grounds. Where delay in execution results from the proposed detenu's own evasion of process, that delay does not by itself snap the live link or justify quashing the order at the pre-execution stage. en-us Mon, 25 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2016 10:13:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182611 Preventive detention law does not require prior supply of the detention order, grounds, or supporting materials before execution, and Article 22 does not create such a pre-arrest entitlement. The Right to Information Act cannot override that scheme, so a proposed detenu has no enforceable right to obtain those documents in advance. Pre-execution challenge to a detention order is available only in exceptional cases, such as lack of jurisdiction, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague and extraneous grounds. Where delay in execution results from the proposed detenu's own evasion of process, that delay does not by itself snap the live link or justify quashing the order at the pre-execution stage. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 25 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182611