<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1096 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182613</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand for the period 2005-2008 related to &quot;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&quot; service. The disagreement over the taxable amount was resolved in favor of the appellant, who demonstrated payment of service tax on the commission received. The tribunal found no wilful suppression of facts and deemed the demand beyond the normal one-year period as time-barred. Shri Yogendra Adlak&#039;s assistance was recognized in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 10:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1096 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182613</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand for the period 2005-2008 related to &quot;Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency&quot; service. The disagreement over the taxable amount was resolved in favor of the appellant, who demonstrated payment of service tax on the commission received. The tribunal found no wilful suppression of facts and deemed the demand beyond the normal one-year period as time-barred. Shri Yogendra Adlak&#039;s assistance was recognized in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>