<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3479</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to refund the excess amount collected from the petitioner along with statutory interest within a specified timeframe. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to pass a fresh order within the specified time entitled the petitioner to the refund, citing relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and a previous judgment to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3479</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to refund the excess amount collected from the petitioner along with statutory interest within a specified timeframe. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to pass a fresh order within the specified time entitled the petitioner to the refund, citing relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and a previous judgment to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>