https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327675 The appeals were allowed in part. The Tribunal rejected central excise duty demands against the appellants, except for undisputed amounts. Penalties on partners were set aside, and a penalty on one individual was reduced. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence for serious charges like clandestine removal and highlighted the necessity of following statutory procedures for electronic records' admissibility. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327675 The appeals were allowed in part. The Tribunal rejected central excise duty demands against the appellants, except for undisputed amounts. Penalties on partners were set aside, and a penalty on one individual was reduced. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence for serious charges like clandestine removal and highlighted the necessity of following statutory procedures for electronic records' admissibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327675