<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 652 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327671</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondents to release the cargo without imposing demurrage charges and to refund the erroneously collected demurrage amount. The judgment emphasized adherence to regulations and the Customs Department&#039;s role in cargo clearance processes, resolving the dispute over demurrage payment and cargo release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 652 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327671</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondents to release the cargo without imposing demurrage charges and to refund the erroneously collected demurrage amount. The judgment emphasized adherence to regulations and the Customs Department&#039;s role in cargo clearance processes, resolving the dispute over demurrage payment and cargo release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>