https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327666 The Punjab Value Added Tax Act revision remedy remained subject to the statutory pre-deposit requirement, and the earlier ruling had already upheld that scheme. The Court noted that interim protection could be granted in appropriate cases by partial or complete waiver of the deposit condition, but the identical controversy had already been answered. Applying that settled position, the petitions were disposed of in the same manner as the earlier connected matters, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 65(3) was treated as valid. en-us Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327666 The Punjab Value Added Tax Act revision remedy remained subject to the statutory pre-deposit requirement, and the earlier ruling had already upheld that scheme. The Court noted that interim protection could be granted in appropriate cases by partial or complete waiver of the deposit condition, but the identical controversy had already been answered. Applying that settled position, the petitions were disposed of in the same manner as the earlier connected matters, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 65(3) was treated as valid. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327666