<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 636 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessee, a limited company in the manufacturing sector. The ld. CIT(A) had deleted the penalty based on discrepancies in provisions for warranty and suppressed sales, citing precedents where penalties were removed for similar disallowances. The Tribunal supported this decision, referencing a CBDT circular and the precedent set by a Supreme Court decision, ultimately finding no fault in the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order and affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 00:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 636 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessee, a limited company in the manufacturing sector. The ld. CIT(A) had deleted the penalty based on discrepancies in provisions for warranty and suppressed sales, citing precedents where penalties were removed for similar disallowances. The Tribunal supported this decision, referencing a CBDT circular and the precedent set by a Supreme Court decision, ultimately finding no fault in the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order and affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>