<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 628 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act was not applicable as the assessee transferred only the right of ownership and not the land itself. The Assessing Officer was directed to compute the capital gains based on the actual consideration received of Rs. 5 Lakhs. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 29th April 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 10:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 628 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act was not applicable as the assessee transferred only the right of ownership and not the land itself. The Assessing Officer was directed to compute the capital gains based on the actual consideration received of Rs. 5 Lakhs. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 29th April 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>