<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 626 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of 1,19,31,643/- imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 09:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 626 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of 1,19,31,643/- imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>