<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment was not justified as it was based on a change of opinion and retrospective amendments. The original assessment had considered all necessary facts, and there was no failure to disclose material facts by the assessee. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the reassessment and related adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 09:59:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment was not justified as it was based on a change of opinion and retrospective amendments. The original assessment had considered all necessary facts, and there was no failure to disclose material facts by the assessee. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the reassessment and related adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>