<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 622 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 83,45,740/- for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the stock difference was already explained by the assessee&#039;s declaration for AY 2008-09, covering all discrepancies found during the survey, and concluded that there was no need for further addition in either AY 2007-08 or AY 2008-09.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 23:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 622 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 83,45,740/- for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the stock difference was already explained by the assessee&#039;s declaration for AY 2008-09, covering all discrepancies found during the survey, and concluded that there was no need for further addition in either AY 2007-08 or AY 2008-09.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>