<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 620 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the issue back to the AO for re-examination. The assessee was not entitled to deductions for the provision for bad debts of Rs. 60,00,000 for the assessment year 2008-09 and Rs. 1,06,63,566 for the assessment year 2007-08. The AO was instructed to verify the assessee&#039;s compliance with Section 36(1)(viia) based on the Supreme Court decision and other relevant judicial decisions, providing the assessee an opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 09:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 620 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the issue back to the AO for re-examination. The assessee was not entitled to deductions for the provision for bad debts of Rs. 60,00,000 for the assessment year 2008-09 and Rs. 1,06,63,566 for the assessment year 2007-08. The AO was instructed to verify the assessee&#039;s compliance with Section 36(1)(viia) based on the Supreme Court decision and other relevant judicial decisions, providing the assessee an opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>