https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182608 Delay alone does not justify rejecting a public law challenge to an alleged continuing usurpation of public office; where the legality of disqualification remains live and affects public interest, the merits must still be examined. The Speaker under the Tenth Schedule has no inherent power of review, and no such power can be implied absent express or necessary statutory conferral. Finality of the disqualification decision, together with the availability of judicial review, negates any internal review jurisdiction. The review orders were therefore nullities, while the original disqualification orders continued to operate and the surviving writ remedies were to be heard on merits. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 May 2016 13:45:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182608 Delay alone does not justify rejecting a public law challenge to an alleged continuing usurpation of public office; where the legality of disqualification remains live and affects public interest, the merits must still be examined. The Speaker under the Tenth Schedule has no inherent power of review, and no such power can be implied absent express or necessary statutory conferral. Finality of the disqualification decision, together with the availability of judicial review, negates any internal review jurisdiction. The review orders were therefore nullities, while the original disqualification orders continued to operate and the surviving writ remedies were to be heard on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182608