<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 659 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182607</link>
    <description>The case involved challenges to additions for undisclosed sales, compounding fees for illegal mining, and denial of benefits under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT remanded all issues to the AO for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on October 25, 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 13:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 659 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182607</link>
      <description>The case involved challenges to additions for undisclosed sales, compounding fees for illegal mining, and denial of benefits under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT remanded all issues to the AO for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on October 25, 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>