<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Case laws for Section 50C.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110351</link>
    <description>The operative issue is requests for case law supporting the assessee on valuation under Section 50C, with a forum reply seeking further factual elaboration to permit a substantive response on authorities addressing valuation adjustments, burden of proof, and market value methodology.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 11:56:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Case laws for Section 50C.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110351</link>
      <description>The operative issue is requests for case law supporting the assessee on valuation under Section 50C, with a forum reply seeking further factual elaboration to permit a substantive response on authorities addressing valuation adjustments, burden of proof, and market value methodology.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 11:56:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>