<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1193 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182603</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed issues regarding the right of detaining authority to withhold detention order and grounds until execution, grounds to challenge preventive detention orders pre-execution, and the court&#039;s authority to direct disclosure of detention order and grounds. The Court emphasized the importance of serving detention orders and grounds to detenues for a fair opportunity to challenge the legality of detention. The Court ordered the detention orders and grounds to be disclosed to the petitioners by a specified date, focusing on procedural fairness in preventive detention cases without making definitive conclusions on broader legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 11:38:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1193 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182603</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed issues regarding the right of detaining authority to withhold detention order and grounds until execution, grounds to challenge preventive detention orders pre-execution, and the court&#039;s authority to direct disclosure of detention order and grounds. The Court emphasized the importance of serving detention orders and grounds to detenues for a fair opportunity to challenge the legality of detention. The Court ordered the detention orders and grounds to be disclosed to the petitioners by a specified date, focusing on procedural fairness in preventive detention cases without making definitive conclusions on broader legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>