<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1164 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to admit fresh evidence, direct the Assessing Officer to verify calculations, and focus on Arm&#039;s Length Price for international transactions only was upheld. The judgment delved into procedural aspects of evidence admission, Tribunal&#039;s authority over AO, and ALP calculation methodology. The ruling provided clarity on these key issues in tax assessments, emphasizing adherence to rules and guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 10:22:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1164 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to admit fresh evidence, direct the Assessing Officer to verify calculations, and focus on Arm&#039;s Length Price for international transactions only was upheld. The judgment delved into procedural aspects of evidence admission, Tribunal&#039;s authority over AO, and ALP calculation methodology. The ruling provided clarity on these key issues in tax assessments, emphasizing adherence to rules and guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>