<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 607 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for central excise duty for the period of non-production from 01.07.2008 to 16.07.2008, granted abatement for this period, and confirmed the liability for interest on delayed payment of duty for July 2008. The penalty imposed was also set aside as the main demand was not sustained. The appeal favored the appellants on the duty demand and penalty issues, but the liability for interest on delayed payment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 607 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for central excise duty for the period of non-production from 01.07.2008 to 16.07.2008, granted abatement for this period, and confirmed the liability for interest on delayed payment of duty for July 2008. The penalty imposed was also set aside as the main demand was not sustained. The appeal favored the appellants on the duty demand and penalty issues, but the liability for interest on delayed payment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>