<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 606 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant based on stock record discrepancies and valuation method. Duty liability was imposed for significant discrepancies, while the penalty under Rule 26 was set aside. The appellant received consequential benefits, addressing duty liability, penalty imposition, stock verification issues, and the extended limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 606 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant based on stock record discrepancies and valuation method. Duty liability was imposed for significant discrepancies, while the penalty under Rule 26 was set aside. The appellant received consequential benefits, addressing duty liability, penalty imposition, stock verification issues, and the extended limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>