<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 604 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327623</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the goods in question, including Dena Ji Brand shampoos, were not classified as ayurvedic medicines and were subject to excise duty. An interim stay was granted on the impugned order, contingent upon the petitioner depositing fifty percent of the demanded duty within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 604 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327623</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue, ruling that the goods in question, including Dena Ji Brand shampoos, were not classified as ayurvedic medicines and were subject to excise duty. An interim stay was granted on the impugned order, contingent upon the petitioner depositing fifty percent of the demanded duty within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>