<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 602 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order against a Custom House Agent for violations under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, due to procedural irregularities. The Tribunal found that the order was issued without indicating disagreement with the enquiry report, violating principles of natural justice. Additionally, the order was passed beyond the prescribed 90-day period, breaching the time limit set by the regulations. Consequently, the appeal was allowed based on these grounds, emphasizing the importance of adherence to procedural fairness and statutory timelines in regulatory enforcement actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 602 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order against a Custom House Agent for violations under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, due to procedural irregularities. The Tribunal found that the order was issued without indicating disagreement with the enquiry report, violating principles of natural justice. Additionally, the order was passed beyond the prescribed 90-day period, breaching the time limit set by the regulations. Consequently, the appeal was allowed based on these grounds, emphasizing the importance of adherence to procedural fairness and statutory timelines in regulatory enforcement actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>