<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 600 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, setting aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the firm and its directors. The revenue failed to prove the goods were smuggled, and the appellants provided valid documents to explain the source of the goods. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the respondents were entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 600 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, setting aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the firm and its directors. The revenue failed to prove the goods were smuggled, and the appellants provided valid documents to explain the source of the goods. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the respondents were entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>