<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 571 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not have the right to reopen assessments without fresh material, as the brochure found during the search operation was not incriminating. The additions made based on on-money receipts were deleted as there was no corroborative evidence to support them. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 00:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 571 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not have the right to reopen assessments without fresh material, as the brochure found during the search operation was not incriminating. The additions made based on on-money receipts were deleted as there was no corroborative evidence to support them. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing both the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>