<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1001 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182586</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The tribunal emphasized the necessity of material evidence to prove that liabilities have ceased to exist before treating them as income under section 41(1). The tribunal cited relevant case law to support its decision and concluded that there was no evidence that the creditors had forgone their claims in the present case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 17:22:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1001 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182586</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The tribunal emphasized the necessity of material evidence to prove that liabilities have ceased to exist before treating them as income under section 41(1). The tribunal cited relevant case law to support its decision and concluded that there was no evidence that the creditors had forgone their claims in the present case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>