<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 182 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3462</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, confirming that the replacement of machinery is considered revenue expenditure and that the interest on borrowed capital advanced to the sister concern is allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 182 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3462</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, confirming that the replacement of machinery is considered revenue expenditure and that the interest on borrowed capital advanced to the sister concern is allowable as a deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>