https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182578 The court allowed the appeals in favor of the Union of India for most petitioners, finding they failed to meet the requirements for invoking promissory estoppel. However, it dismissed the appeal against Meghalaya Steel & Concrete Products (P.) Ltd., granting them the excise duty exemption from the date of production commencement as promised in the Industrial Policy Resolution. The court directed the government to issue fresh notifications in conformity with the Resolution for this petitioner. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2016 15:20:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182578 The court allowed the appeals in favor of the Union of India for most petitioners, finding they failed to meet the requirements for invoking promissory estoppel. However, it dismissed the appeal against Meghalaya Steel & Concrete Products (P.) Ltd., granting them the excise duty exemption from the date of production commencement as promised in the Industrial Policy Resolution. The court directed the government to issue fresh notifications in conformity with the Resolution for this petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182578