<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 740 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182562</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the assessee to raise an additional ground regarding business expenditure incurred in a different assessment year. The Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for a determination on the merits, following the Kerala High Court&#039;s view. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 740 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182562</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the assessee to raise an additional ground regarding business expenditure incurred in a different assessment year. The Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for a determination on the merits, following the Kerala High Court&#039;s view. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>