<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1583 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182560</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the petitioner&#039;s immunity claim from service tax under Article 289 of the Constitution for Renting of Immovable Property. It found the adjudication authority&#039;s analysis unsatisfactory for Construction of Complexes and other services, granting a waiver of pre-deposit pending further proceedings. The tribunal deferred detailed consideration on actual receipts and apportionment of consideration for lease and sale transactions. The final decision granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stayed further proceedings, requiring the petitioner to remit a specified amount within twelve weeks to avoid appeal rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:31:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1583 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182560</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the petitioner&#039;s immunity claim from service tax under Article 289 of the Constitution for Renting of Immovable Property. It found the adjudication authority&#039;s analysis unsatisfactory for Construction of Complexes and other services, granting a waiver of pre-deposit pending further proceedings. The tribunal deferred detailed consideration on actual receipts and apportionment of consideration for lease and sale transactions. The final decision granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stayed further proceedings, requiring the petitioner to remit a specified amount within twelve weeks to avoid appeal rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>