<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 357 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182559</link>
    <description>The appeal and writ petition were dismissed as the delay in considering the representation was reasonable due to postal delays, the detaining authority had applied its mind appropriately despite mentioning potential release on bail, and the alleged vital documents were not considered crucial to the decision-making process. The Court highlighted the importance of evaluating each case&#039;s individual circumstances to assess the validity of the detention order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 357 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182559</link>
      <description>The appeal and writ petition were dismissed as the delay in considering the representation was reasonable due to postal delays, the detaining authority had applied its mind appropriately despite mentioning potential release on bail, and the alleged vital documents were not considered crucial to the decision-making process. The Court highlighted the importance of evaluating each case&#039;s individual circumstances to assess the validity of the detention order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>