https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182558 The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the detention order. The Court found that the detaining authority had applied its mind appropriately despite delays in processing the petitioner's representations. It emphasized the subjective satisfaction required for detention orders and the importance of handling preventive detention cases diligently. The Court also noted that delays in considering representations against Section 10(1) declarations were reasonable in this case. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:10:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182558 The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the detention order. The Court found that the detaining authority had applied its mind appropriately despite delays in processing the petitioner's representations. It emphasized the subjective satisfaction required for detention orders and the importance of handling preventive detention cases diligently. The Court also noted that delays in considering representations against Section 10(1) declarations were reasonable in this case. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182558