<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 975 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182557</link>
    <description>Unexplained delay in disposing of a preventive detenu&#039;s representation under Article 22(5) violates the constitutional safeguard of prompt consideration. The representation was made on 06-08-2011 and rejected on 07-09-2011, and the delay in obtaining parawise remarks from the sponsoring authority remained unaccounted for on the record. That delay was held fatal to continued detention, and the detention order was rendered unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 975 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182557</link>
      <description>Unexplained delay in disposing of a preventive detenu&#039;s representation under Article 22(5) violates the constitutional safeguard of prompt consideration. The representation was made on 06-08-2011 and rejected on 07-09-2011, and the delay in obtaining parawise remarks from the sponsoring authority remained unaccounted for on the record. That delay was held fatal to continued detention, and the detention order was rendered unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>