<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 86 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3457</link>
    <description>The court held in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of expenses incurred by the executors for legal and professional charges, executors&#039; expenses in England and India, and court fee expenses while computing capital gains. The court determined that these expenses were essential for transferring the property, including obtaining probate and evicting an unauthorized occupant, and should be considered as expenditure in connection with the transfer. The court distinguished a previous judgment cited by the Revenue and emphasized the genuineness of the claim, ultimately ruling in favor of allowing the deduction of the mentioned expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 86 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3457</link>
      <description>The court held in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of expenses incurred by the executors for legal and professional charges, executors&#039; expenses in England and India, and court fee expenses while computing capital gains. The court determined that these expenses were essential for transferring the property, including obtaining probate and evicting an unauthorized occupant, and should be considered as expenditure in connection with the transfer. The court distinguished a previous judgment cited by the Revenue and emphasized the genuineness of the claim, ultimately ruling in favor of allowing the deduction of the mentioned expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>