https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327586 The court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 as it was filed 638 days late. The appellant's explanation for the delay was deemed implausible and unsupported by evidence. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal remedies, the court held that the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate diligence and circumstances beyond their control. The court highlighted the need for parties to act promptly in pursuing their appeals to ensure timely redressal of legal grievances. en-us Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327586 The court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 as it was filed 638 days late. The appellant's explanation for the delay was deemed implausible and unsupported by evidence. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal remedies, the court held that the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate diligence and circumstances beyond their control. The court highlighted the need for parties to act promptly in pursuing their appeals to ensure timely redressal of legal grievances. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327586