https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327585 Supervisory interference may be justified where an adjudication is tainted by breach of natural justice, even if an appellate remedy exists. Affected parties must receive an effective hearing and a fair chance to meet the material used against them; denial of the consultant who was to argue the matter, together with reliance on an undisclosed report relating to another assessee, amounted to procedural infirmity. The order-in-original was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication, with a direction for hearing and a limited pre-deposit. en-us Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327585 Supervisory interference may be justified where an adjudication is tainted by breach of natural justice, even if an appellate remedy exists. Affected parties must receive an effective hearing and a fair chance to meet the material used against them; denial of the consultant who was to argue the matter, together with reliance on an undisclosed report relating to another assessee, amounted to procedural infirmity. The order-in-original was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication, with a direction for hearing and a limited pre-deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327585