<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 560 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327579</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the excise appeals because the tax amount involved was negligible, and the dismissal was made on that ground alone. The order does not discuss the substantive excise dispute or record any merits-based determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:04:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 560 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327579</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the excise appeals because the tax amount involved was negligible, and the dismissal was made on that ground alone. The order does not discuss the substantive excise dispute or record any merits-based determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>