<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 547 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals of the assessee, confirming the disallowance of interest and depreciation claims, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, and the addition towards sundry creditors. The judgment emphasized the necessity of compliance with statutory requirements for claiming deductions and the importance of substantiating claims with adequate evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 547 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals of the assessee, confirming the disallowance of interest and depreciation claims, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, and the addition towards sundry creditors. The judgment emphasized the necessity of compliance with statutory requirements for claiming deductions and the importance of substantiating claims with adequate evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>