<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 530 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Assessee&#039;s claims for depreciation on non-compete fees, reduction from stock, foreign travel expenses, certain expenses considered capital, and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) were allowed based on existing case law and lack of contrary evidence from the Revenue. The order was pronounced on 06/04/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=428033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 530 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Assessee&#039;s claims for depreciation on non-compete fees, reduction from stock, foreign travel expenses, certain expenses considered capital, and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) were allowed based on existing case law and lack of contrary evidence from the Revenue. The order was pronounced on 06/04/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>